Signal to Noise
Mercedes-Benz Specs
Coupes
Convertibles
Sedans
Miscellanea


If you read enough magazines, you may notice that some test numbers vary wildly between publications. Many of them vary by a half-second or more in the quarter. Some people may say, "that's due to the drivers", but I can assure you that's not true. Magazines use professionals, and they know how to drive. One writer may be faster than his or her peers, but the difference is not a half-second in a straight line. In an attempt to get to the bottom of this, some owners have gone to their local drag strip (or used their G-Tech, which can be off). To their surprise, many have found that they cannot replicate the numbers they see in the pubs.

I can tell you first hand why the numbers are at odds; the testing methods differ. That sounds easy and makes sense, but you still don't know "why".

  "Why would this magazine use one method, and that magazine use another? Regardless as to the magazine or the driver, why the heck can't I duplicate the number? It's ONLY zero to sixty. How hard can this be?"  

Internet posters are full of theories, but the "why" is probably rollout. I can explain how rollout is used in testing, but first there a few things you have to understand.

At an NHRA drag strip, each lane has a staging area. That's the area the driver is supposed to be in when the light turns green. The staging area has two light beams that cross the lane. Those lights are used to help the driver position their car in the staging area. In each lane, the light emits from one side, and is picked up by a sensor on the other side. When the tires interrupt the light beam, that triggers the staging lights, which the driver can see. The first light beam is the pre-staging light. Its sole function is to alert the driver that they are getting close to the second light, which is the staging light. Once the second light is illuminated, the driver comes to a complete stop.

This is how it works from the driver's perspective: the driver slowly pulls the car into the staging area. They creep forward. At some point, their tires interrupt the first light beam, and the pre-staging light turns on. The driver then creeps forward very slowly until the tires interrupt the second light beam, and the staging light comes on. At that point, the driver stops the car waits for the green light on the tree.

After both drivers are staged, the yellow countdown lights will start. First the top countdown light will illuminate. A half-second later, the second countdown light will illuminate. A half-second later, the third countdown light will illuminate. After another half-second, the green light will illuminate. At that point, the driver will press the gas pedal and go. However, the timing clock won't begin until the pickup from the staging light is receiving a light signal. It will not receive that signal while the tire is in the way. The tire must roll forward before that happens. Typically, the car has to move forward about a foot. At the point where the tire has moved forward enough to clear the staging light, the car is traveling at a speed. That speed is about 3 MPH, and that's called "rollout".

This brings us to why many owners can't duplicate the numbers at a track. Car magazines don't typically use tracks. If they did use tracks, they'd have to rent them for months on end. It would be cheaper to simply buy a track. For performance numbers, most publications use data acquisition boxes. These electronic boxes are extremely accurate, and eliminate the need for a track. For example, a Racelogic VBOX can

  • Accurately determine speed to within six hundredths of one mile per hour
  • Measure distance to within less than half an inch.
  • Measure time to within "one" 100,000th of a second.

    All a magazine tester needs is a flat road. Since a VBOX can also measure height, acquiring a "private test facility" (a remote flat road) is really not that difficult.

    So what does all of this have to do with test speeds?

    Many magazines use a "simulated" rollout. Publications are not alone in this, several manufacturers do too. "Many" and "several" are relative terms, so I'll quantify it. Ford, GM, Honda, Nissan, and Toyota all use simulated rollouts for their press data. Hachette Filipacchi Médias is the largest magazine publisher in the world. For US pubs, they use it. So does Source Interlink Media. For those that don't know, Hachette Filipacchi Médias and Source Interlink Media are the publishers behind Motor Trend, European Car, C&D, R&T, Hot Rod, Car Craft, Import Tuner, etc.

    A simulated rollout means you're not looking at true zero to speed or quarter mile times. You're looking at 3 MPH to sixty, eighty, or one hundred. Also, traction is typically an issue for powerful cars. It's much less of an issue from a roll. This also answers another question; why do the specs from German manufacturers always appear low? - They don't use a simulated rollout.

    Aside from the rollout, some manufacturers just plain cheat. They regularly put ringers in the press pool. By "ringers" I mean cars that are not representative of what a customer will purchase from a dealer. For example, I was at a press event where I saw a Japanese luxury car follow a supercharged Ford Mustang out of the last turn before entering the front straight at a race track. I had driven the Mustang earlier. It was running well, and in stock form produced over 500HP. The Lexus allegedly put out about 350 HP. The Mustang exited the last turn with about a two car-length lead. The Lexus caught the Mustang down that front straight. The Lexus rep told us it was a GS "Tuner Edition". The Ford rep used a different term.


    © Marcus B. Fitzhugh 2010